Quantcast
Channel: Recent Discussions — GATK-Forum
Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 12345

HaplotypeCaller in GVCF mode for trio

$
0
0

Hello!

I am setting up a GATK pipeline for analysis of trio. I have run all the step perfectly up to HaplotypeCaller, then GenotypeGVCFs, and finally PhaseByTransmission walkers.

However, by manually checking a few variants, I am puzzled by the fact that there are variant bases in the three family members, but only the father sees its variants called.

On the attached screenshot, we can see the variants (41/23 for the mother, 22/15 for the daughter, 22/18 for the father).

However in the g.vcf files for the position :

alignment/NA12878_daughter/rawHaplotypeCaller/NA12878_daughter.others.hc.g.vcf:1 201178788 . A .. END=201178788 GT:DP:GQ:MIN_DP:PL 0/0:28:0:28:0,0,449
alignment/NA12891_father/rawHaplotypeCaller/NA12891_father.others.hc.g.vcf:1 201178788 . A G, 173.77. BaseQRankSum=-1.949;ClippingRankSum=1.169;DP=34;MLEAC=1,0;MLEAF=0.500,0.00;MQ=56.41;MQ0=0;MQRankSum=-1.772;ReadPosRankSum=-1.701 GT:AD:DP:GQ:PL:SB 0/1:21,13,0:34:99:202,0,560,262,596,858:10,11,2,11
alignment/NA12892_mother/rawHaplotypeCaller/NA12892_mother.others.hc.g.vcf:1 201178788 . A . .END=201178788 GT:DP:GQ:MIN_DP:PL 0/0:49:0:49:0,0,1040

And in the joint geno file :

1 201178788 . A G 176.93 . AC=1;AF=0.167;AN=6;BaseQRankSum=-1.949e+00;ClippingRankSum=1.17;DP=111;FS=11.252;GQ_MEAN=67.33;GQ_STDDEV=116.62;MLEAC=2;MLEAF=0.333;MQ=56.41;MQ0=0;MQRankSum=-1.772e+00;NCC=0;QD=5.20;ReadPosRankSum=-1.701e+00 GT:AD:DP:GQ:PL 0/0:28,0:28:0:0,0,449 0/1:21,13:34:99:202,0,560 0/0:49,0:49:0:0,0,1040

And in the PhaseByTransmission file :

1 201178788 . A G 176.93 . AC=1;AF=0.167;AN=6;BaseQRankSum=-1.949e+00;ClippingRankSum=1.17;DP=111;FS=11.252;GQ_MEAN=67.33;GQ_STDDEV=116.62;MLEAC=2;MLEAF=0.333;MQ=56.41;MQ0=0;MQRankSum=-1.772e+00;NCC=0;QD=5.20;ReadPosRankSum=-1.701e+00 GT:AD:DP:GQ:PL:TP 0|0:28,0:28:0:0,0,449:1 0|1:21,13:34:99:202,0,560:1 0|1:49,0:49:0:0,0,1040:1

I know that between tools, I should not expect perfect overlap on the depth of each allele, and for me it is close enough for the father (IGV: 22/18, HC: 21/13).

However the mother and the daughter look like they are 49/0 and 28/0 (for IGV, they are 41/23 and 22/15).

Could it be that reads supporting the alt allele have bad qualities (to the point of having 0 alt in the end)?

Many thanks in advance!


Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 12345

Trending Articles



<script src="https://jsc.adskeeper.com/r/s/rssing.com.1596347.js" async> </script>